Skip to content
RFSoc

News

News: entries added, and corrections made to entries already published

A reference work's news is what it has added and what it got wrong, so both are listed here with the date each page was last checked against its sources.

Entries listed33Dates3

Everything below is generated from the pages themselves rather than kept as a separate list, so it cannot fall out of step with the site. The date against each entry is the date its statements were last checked against the sources listed on it, which is not the same as the date it was written and is the more useful of the two.

28 August 2026

  • Frank Comstock Entry American arranger; Les Brown's Band of Renown, and Adam-12

26 August 2026

25 August 2026

What counts as a correction

A change of substance: a date, a credit, an attribution, or a claim that turned out to rest on less than it appeared to. Those are recorded, because a reference work that revises silently cannot be cited with confidence by anybody. Typographical and wording changes are not recorded, because listing them would bury the corrections that matter.

The most common correction in this subject is a date, and the most common cause is a source that gave one kind of date without saying which kind. A recording has a session date, a release date and a catalogue date; a film has a production year and two or more release years. Where a page here has been corrected on a date, it is usually because the original reading merged two of those.

Corrections are welcome, and the ones worth most are the ones backed by paperwork. A session sheet settles who played. A publisher catalogue entry settles when a library disc entered circulation. A reissue booklet frequently carries a recording date that appears nowhere else in print, because the compiler was working from the documents while writing it. If you hold any of those and a page here contradicts it, the document wins and the page will say so. Contact details are on the imprint page.

One thing this page deliberately does not do is present itself as busier than it is. A dated list is easy to inflate by recording trivial edits, and a site that appears to change constantly reads as more authoritative than one that does not. The entries below are pages whose substance was checked on the date given, and nothing has been added to make the list longer.